l>Starch Hydrolysis by Amylase

EXPERIMENT NO. 5

STARCH HYDROLYSIS through AMYLASE

Prepared byNam sunlight Wang
Department of chemical & Biomolecular barisalcity.orgineeringUniversity that MarylandCollege Park, MD 20742-2111ENCH485

Table the Contents

Objectives advent List that Reagents and also InstrumentsProcedures notes Discussions inquiries References Tablular forms Comments

Objectives

To research the miscellaneous parameters that affect the kinetics ofalpha-amylase catalytic analysis hydrolysis that starch.

Introduction

Starchy building material constitute the major part that the human diet formost of the people in the world, and many other animals.They room synthesized normally in a range of plants. Some plantexamples v high strength content room corn, potato, rice, sorghum,wheat, and also cassava. The is no surprise that every one of these space partof what us consume to derive carbohydrates. Comparable tocellulose, strength molecules room glucose polymers linked togetherby the alpha-1,4 and alpha-1,6 glucosidic bonds, together opposedto the beta-1,4 glucosidic bonds because that cellulose. In stimulate tomake use of the carbon and energy save on computer in starch, the humandigestive system, v the aid of the enzyme amylases, mustfirst breakdown the polymer to smaller sized assimilable sugars, whichis ultimately converted to the individual an easy glucose units.Because of the presence of two varieties of linkages, thealpha-1,4 and also the alpha-1,6, various structures arepossible for starch molecules. An unbranched, single chainpolymer the 500 to 2000 glucose subunits with just thealpha-1,4 glucosidic bond is dubbed amylose. On theother hand, the visibility of alpha-1,6 glucosidic linkagesresults in a branched glucose polymer called amylopectin.The level of branching in amylopectin is around one pertwenty-five glucose devices in the unbranched segments. Anotherclosely associated compound functioning together the glucose storage inanimal cells is called glycogen, which has actually one branchingper 12 glucose units. The degree of branching and also the next chainlbarisalcity.orgth differ from resource to source, yet in basic the much more thechains space branched, the an ext the starch is soluble.Starch is normally insoluble in water at room temperature.Because of this, strength in nature is stored in cells together smallgranules which have the right to be watched under a microscope. Starch granulesare quite resistant come penetration through both water andhydrolytic enzymes because of the formation of hydrogen bonds withinthe very same molecule and also with other bordering molecules. However,these inter- and also intra-hydrogen binding can come to be weak together thetemperature of the suspension is raised. When an aqueoussuspension of starch is heated, the hydrogen bonds weaken, wateris absorbed, and also the starch granules swell. This process iscommonly called gelatinization since the solution formedhas a gelatinous, very viscous consistency. The very same processhas lengthy been employed come thicken broth in food preparation.Depending on the relative place of the bond under attack ascounted native the end of the chain, the products of this digestiveprocess are dextrin, maltotriose, maltose, and glucose, etc.Dextrins are shorter, damaged starch segments that kind as theresult that the arbitrarily hydrolysis of interior glucosidic bonds. Amolecule the maltotriose is formed if the third bond native the endof a starch molecule is cleaved; a molecule that maltose isformed if the allude of assault is the second bond; a molecule ofglucose outcomes if the bond gift cleaved is the terminal one;and so on. As can be checked out from the exercises in Experiment No.3, the initial action in random depolymerization is the splittingof big chains into various smaller sized sized segments. Thebreakdown of huge particles dramatically reduces the viscosity ofgelatinized strength solution, causing a procedure calledliquefaction because of the thinning of the solution. The finalstages the depolymerization are mainly the development of mono-,di-, and tri-saccharides. This procedure is calledsaccharification, because of the formation of saccharides.Since a wide selection of organisms, including humans, have the right to digeststarch, alpha-amylase is obviously commonly synthesized innature, together opposed to cellulase. Because that example, human saliva andpancreatic cheap contain a huge amount that alpha-amylasefor starch digestion. The specificity that the bond struck byalpha-amylases counts on the resources of the enzymes.Currently, two significant classes the alpha-amylases arecommercially created through microbial fermentation. Based onthe point out of assault in the glucose polymer chain, they can beclassified into two categories, liquefying and saccharifying.Because the bacterial alpha-amylase come be used in thisexperiment randomly attacks only the alpha-1,4 bonds, itbelongs to the liquefying category. The hydrolysis reactioncatalyzed by this class of enzymes is usually lugged out just tothe degree that, because that example, the strength is calculation solubleenough to allow easy removal from starch-sized structure in thetextile industry. The paper industry additionally uses liquefyingamylases on the starch offered in record coating where breakage intothe the smallest glucose subunits is actually undesirable. (Onecannot bind cellulose fibers along with sugar!)On the various other hand, the fungal alpha-amylase belongs to thesaccharifying category and attacks the second linkage native thenonreducing terminals (i.e. C4 end) that the straight segment,resulting in the separating off of 2 glucose units at a time.Of course, the product is a disaccharide dubbed maltose. Thebond not correct is thus more extensive in saccharifying enzymesthan in liquefying enzymes. The strength chains are literallychopped into tiny bits and pieces. Finally, theamyloglucosidase (also called glucoamylase) component of anamylase preparation selectively strikes the critical bond top top thenonreducing terminals. The type to be used in this experimentcan plot on both the alpha-1,4 and also the alpha-1,6 glucosidiclinkages at a relative price of 1:20, bring about the splittingoff of basic glucose units right into the solution. Fungal amylaseand amyloglucosidase may be used together to transform starch tosimple sugars. The practical applications of this form of enzymemixture include the manufacturing of corn syrup and also the conversionof grain mashes to sugars in brewing.Thus, that is necessary to clues the source of enzymes when theactions and also kinetics of the enzymes space compared. Four types ofalpha-amylases from different sources will be to work in thisexperiment: 3 of microbial origin and also one of person origin.The effects of temperature, pH, substrate concentration, andinhibitor concentration top top the kinetics of amylase catalyzedreactions will certainly be studied. Finally, the action of the amylasepreparations isolated indigenous microbial sources will be contrasted tothat from human being saliva.

List that Reagents and also Instruments

A. EquipmentErlenmeyer flasksBeakersGraduated cylinderPipets, 1ml, 10mlTest tubesTemperature bathThermometerBalanceSyringeFilter holder and also filter paperSpectrophotometerBrookfield viscometerB. ReagentsEnzymes bacter amylase solution, 3000 SKB units/ml Fungal amylase powder, 40,000 SKB units/g. (Concentration of the fungal amylase solution to be supplied in class: 75g/l) Amyloglucosidase solution, 75 AG units/ml human being salivary amylase Corn starchHCl preventing Solution, 0.1N HClIodine Reagent Stock systems (in aqueous solution) See note 1. Iodine: 5 g/l KI: 50 g/l Potassium Phosphate Buffers KH2PO4 (monobasic phosphate) (FW=136.1) K2HPO4·3H2O (dibasic phosphate) (FW=228.23) CaCl2·2H2O, 0.1M solutionReagents for the analysis of reducing street

Procedures

Because there is a variety of kinetic research studies in this experiment,work will be divided amongst the whole class. Each studentwill be assigned obligations for different sections.Prepare a 20 g/l strength solution.

You are watching: If amylase is added to a sample of potato

Mix 20 g of soluble potato strength in approx. 50 ml of coldwater.While stirring, include the slurry come approx. 900 ml that gentlyboiling water in a huge beaker.Mix well and cool the gelatinized starch systems to roomtemperature.Add more water to bring the total volume to 1 liter.Put a few drops that the starch solution on a glass plate. Add 1drop that the iodine reagent and see that a deep blue color isdeveloped. The blue color indicates the existence of strength inthe solution.Effect of the pHPrepare 0.1M pH buffer solutions ranging from pH=4.5 to pH=9 inincrements the one pH unit. (Note the phosphate buffer is onlygood because that ph=4.5--9 due to the dissociation constant.) Beforecoming come the lab, review just how to do a pH buffer systems in afreshman chemistry textbook and calculate the relative quantities ofKH2PO4 (monobasic phosphate) and K2HPO4·3H2O(dibasic phosphate) necessary to do these phosphate buffersolutions.Add an same volume of one of the above buffer services to5.0ml that the 20g/l starch solution ready in action 1. Theresulting solution should contain 10g/l of starch in a bufferedenvironment.Start the enzymatic digestion process by adding 0.5 ml ofthe bacter amylase solution; shake and mix.Let the hydrolysis reaction proceed for exactly 10 minute at25ºC.Add 0.5 ml the the reaction starch equipment to 5ml the the HClstopping equipment (0.1N)Add 0.5 ml the the above mixture to 5ml iodine equipment to developcolor. Shake and mix. The solution should turn deep blue ifthere is any kind of residual, unconverted starch current in thesolution. The solution is brown-red colored because that partiallydegraded starch, while that is clean for entirely degraded starch.Measure the absorbance v a spectrophotometer at 620nm.See keep in mind 2.Carry out the exact same procedure for the other starch solutionsbuffered at different pH"s. (Use her time wisely; every thesolutions can be handled simultaneously if friend are acquainted withthe procedure. Slightly stagger the sequential sample withdrawalso that there is sufficient time for sample preparation and handling.) 0.5ml | |0.5ml | |0.5ml | | O.D. Sample soln--->---| |--->---| |--->---| |--->---at 620 nm | | | | | | |____| |____| |____| 5ml 5ml 5ml strength soln 0.1N HCl soln iodine solnEffect that TemperatureObtain warm water from either a faucet or a warm temperaturebath. Readjust the temperature of the short-term water baths in500 ml beakers so the they selection from 30 ºC come 90 ºC inincrements that 10 ºC.Prepare the strength substrate by diluting the 20g/l starchsolution prepared in step 1 v an same volume of pH=7.0phosphate buffer solution. This outcomes in a functioning starchconcentration the 10 g/l. Add 5 ml of the starch solution toeach that the check tubes.Allow the temperature of every of the starch options to come toequilibrium v that of the water bath.Add 0.5 ml that the bacter amylase solution to every of thethermostated test tubes to start the reaction.Stop the reaction after precisely 10 minutes and analyze the starchcontent by following the measures outlined in action 2.Effect of heat TreatmentPlace 0.5 ml that the bacter amylase systems each the eleventest tubes.Heat-treat the enzyme solution by placing all the test tubes,except one, in a hot (90ºC) water bath. The untreated enzymeis supplied as the control. Take the end the an initial test tube from theheat after one minute and also quickly carry it come room temperature byimmersing that in a cool water bath. Eliminate the 2nd test tubeafter 2 minutes, the 3rd after 3 minutes, and so on.Add 5 ml that the 10 g/l buffered (pH=7.0) starch equipment to eachof the check tubes include the enzymes.Carry the end the hydrolysis reaction at room temperature and also analyzethe sample after precisely 10 minutes by complying with the proceduresoutlined in action 2.Mix an equal volume that the CaCl2 solution to the enzyme andrepeat the same measures to investigate the warmth stabilizationof the enzymes in the visibility of Ca2+ ions.This set of studies can be done quickly if the measures aresynchronized. If time permits, shot 0.5 ml samples of theamyloglucosidase and 0.5 ml samples the the fungal amylasesolution. To compare the sensitivity to heat for this relatedenzymes. Hint: The liquefaction step in the production ofhigh-fructose corn syrup is lugged out at around 105ºC.Activity of person Salivary AmylaseObtain enough saliva come repeat the pH result study as in action 2.Enzyme SpecificityUse 0.5 ml of the cellulase left end from the previousexperiment. Follow a comparable procedure to determine the decreasein the strength concentration together outlined in action 2. Measure therate with buffered starch solution at pH=4.0 and also 7.0.Effect the Substrate ConcentrationAdd 0.5 ml that the bacterial amylase solution to 50 ml of a 10g/lstarch systems buffered at pH=7.0. Note that less enzyme every mlof substrate is offered in this part of the experiment 보다 theprevious parts. The objective below is to sluggish down the reactionso that multiple sampling is possible with reasonable accuracybefore every the strength is consumed.Take samples regularly to monitor both the to decrease in thestarch concentration and also the rise in the reduce sugarsuntil many of the starch is hydrolyzed. The strength concentrationis measured through the same measures outlined above and the sugarconcentration with the dinitrosalicylic colorimetric technique usedin the previous experiment.Continuously screen the viscosity the the substrate-enzymemixture with a viscometer. Generate a calibration curve for theviscosity together a role of the starch concentration. Keep in mind thatthis component of the examine is fruitful only when the strength solutionis exceptionally thick.Effect of Enzyme SourcesRepeat Procedure 7 v 0.5 ml of the fungal amylase solution.Repeat Procedure 7 with 0.5 ml that the amyloglucosidase.Repeat Procedure 7 to research the joint action of a mixture of0.167 ml of bacterial amylase, 0.167 ml that fungal amylasesolution, and 0.167 ml of amyloglucosidase.This entire Procedure 8 can be concurrently brought out with Procedure 7.Sequential Enzymatic treatment (Corn Syrup Production)In making industrial sugars, e.g. Corn syrup, big gelatinizedstarch molecules are an initial chopped into smaller dextrins v thehelp of bacter amylase. The liquefaction step is followed bysaccharification through either fungal amylase or amyloglucosidase,depending top top the finish use of the sugar. These sequentialenzymatic treatment actions will it is in simulated in this component of theexperimentAdd 0.5 ml that the bacter amylase solution to 50 ml the the20g/l non-buffered strength solution all set in step 1.Periodically location a couple of drops of the reaction mixture top top a glassplate and add one fall of the iodine reagent. The color shouldfinally revolve red, describe the complete conversion of strength todextrin. This liquefaction step must last for roughly 10minutes.When the process of liquefaction is complete, adjust the pH ofthe starch equipment to 4.7 v 1N HCl.Filter the starch solution if it is turbid. Different thesolution into two same parts.To the very first starch solution, include 0.5 ml of amyloglucosidase; tothe second solution include 0.5 ml that fungal amylase solution.Measure the street concentrations periodically. Keep in mind that youneed to usage the appropriate calibration curves due to the fact that one ismaltose and also the other is glucose. Additionally do no forget toreference your monitoring to the initial absorbance at the startof the saccharification procedure so the the increase in the sugarconcentration can be correctly measured. This saccharificationstep need to last for about 30-60 minutes.Taste the two sugar solutions and also compare the sweetness. See Note3.InhibitionFollow Procedure 7, except that the buffered starch equipment atpH-7.0 also contains hydrogen peroxide at a level of 0.5 g/l.If time permits, shot hydrogen peroxide in ~ a level that 1.0 g/l.

See more: What Do You Make The Halloween Spiders Legs Out Of ? How To Make Giant Spider Legs

Enzyme task versus Enzyme ConcentrationMix 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 ml of enzyme options with 5 mlof 10g/l starch solution. Measure the strength concentration after10 minutes together in step 2.For Curious StudentsStudy the simple cleavage the the alpha-1,4 glucosidic binding byusing maltose as the substrate and amyloglucosidase together theenzyme. Arrangement ahead to see just how one can perform this. Forexample, you need to have the ability to distinguish in between maltose andglucose. Keep in mind that in stimulate to use a colorimetric method,maltose and also glucose need to have various extinction coefficients.Can product balance be used to back out the individualconcentrations?

Notes

Dilute the stock solution 1:100 to obtain a functioning solution.Other dilutions may be used, depending on the enzyme activity.Iodine does no dissolve much in water. Iodine (I2)alone or iodide (I-) alone does not shade starch. Itis the triiodide complex ( I3-, formed byI2+I-) that provides off the blue color whenit is incoporated into the coil structure of starch.Remember come take treatment of the lift absorbance causedby the colored iodine solution. The true absorbance should beroughly proportional to the starch concentration. The enzymesolution may need to be diluted an initial if all the starch presentin the sample is digested and all the shade disappears in 10minutes. The many reliable results are derived when thedecrease in the absorbance is roughly 20-70% of theabsorbance that the original, undigested strength solution. Tomeasure the amount of strength digested, you need to recognize theabsorbance corresponding to the early stage undigested starchsolution by adhering to the exact same procedure v a sample in whichplain water in lieu the the enzyme equipment is added to the starchsolution.Be certain you execute not contaminate your sugar systems duringthe assorted stages the the reaction. Perform not taste the sugarsolutions and also risk your health if you are not confident aboutyour rap techniques. However, carry out not expect others to to trust yourresults if friend cannot even convince yourself. All glassware usedin this biochemical barisalcity.orgineering laboratory should always be muchcleaner than the eating tools on your dinning table. Thereagent or analysis grade chemistry we use are also much purerthan the food great ones. Thus, as long as they are notpoisonous or toxic and also as long as you do not contaminate themwhen weighing, the intake of a small amount the them should notcause you any type of harm. Furthermore, as sterility will certainly be stressedin the later part of the course as soon as microorganisms areintroduced, the glassware used then need to be extensively aseptic,certainly cleaner than your finger. If you have hesitation ineating and drinking from any of the glassware or spatula that youuse, I indicate that you acquire into the habit that reallycleaning them prior to using them in the experiment. Although i amnot encouraging girlfriend to walk around and also lick every little thing in sight,you should build a good, aseptic laboratory actions so the youknow you will not hesitate to carry out so if needed. The little amountof HCl included to adjust the pH come 4.7 must not impact you atall; many carbonated drinks space much an ext acidic 보다 this.Do as many experiments as you wish or as time andsupplies/materials permit. Friend can efficiently cover every theprocedures through teaming up with a few other classmates andexchanging data at the finish of the laboratory period. (Be certain to givethe ideal credit, or reprimand for the matter, to your labpartners. Also be certain you recognize what your lab partner havedone.) However, you must prepare your very own lab report.

Questions

Plot the enzyme task versus pH. Native this curve, whatis the optimal pH? explain why enzyme tasks depend top top thepH. An in similar way plot the enzyme task versus temperature.Report the optimal temperature.To what level did the warmth treatment influence the enzymeactivities? What happens to an enzyme when it is subjected toheat?What is the amylase activity in her saliva? just how does itcompare to those prepare isolated from microbial sources?Do they every share the very same optimal pH? exactly how does the optimal pHfor the salivary amylase compare with the pH of the stomach? Ifthe pH that the stomach is no at every favorable for amylase, hasthe nature made a mistake? Considering the relatively shortperiod the time food continues to be in the mouse and considering theamylase activities of human saliva, over there is really not muchdegradation of strength molecules in the mouse. Why go thenature seemingly endow amylase tasks in saliva soinefficiently?Did cellulase exhibit any amylo-saccharifying activities?Combine the data from this experiment with those from theprevious experiment and also derive the rough ratio of the cellulaseactivity come the amylase activity. Because that the function of thiscomparison, you may define the activity to be the number ofglucosidic bonds damaged per gram the enzyme per minute. Whichtype of shortcut was easier to break, alpha-1,4 or beta-1,4?One should base his comparison on the same conditions, e.g.,the exact same acid concentrations and temperature. Indigenous the speculative data for measures 7 and 8, plotthe strength concentration, reducing sugar concentration, andviscosity as attributes of time. Carry out you obtain a closed materialbalance between the strength converted and also the street generated? Ifnot, describe this discrepancy. Is it possible to finding nostarch at all and at the same time just a negligible quantity ofsugar during the food of the hydrolysis reaction? make a plotof the reaction price versus the substrate concentration. AreMichaelis-Menten kinetics applicable come this enzyme system? Ifso, what space the values for the model parameters? (You might needto usage a Lineweaver-Burk plot or other closely related plots toderive these parameters.) If not, what model ideal describes whatyou have observed? did the presence of hydrogen peroxide impact the enzymeactivities? If so, is it a competitive, a non-competitive, oruncompetitive inhibitor?Is the enzyme task directly proportional to the enzymeconcentration? If not, i beg your pardon quantity far better describes theamount of enzyme present?How would certainly you make an acetate pH buffer solution? Listthe compelled chemicals and the composition required to make oneliter the acetate buffer together a function of the pH. Repeat because that acitrate buffer. (Phosphate, acetate, and citrate buffers room themost commonly encountered ones.)The an ext accurate name for alpha-amylase is1,4-alpha-D-glucan-glucanohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.1), the is1,4-alpha-D-glucan maltohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.2) forbeta-amylase, and exo-1,4-alpha-glucosidase or1,4-alpha-D-glucan glucohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.3) foramyloglucosidase. What reaction walk beta-amylase catalyze?Comment on ways to boost the experiment.

References

Bailey, J.E. And Ollis, D.F.,Biochemical barisalcity.orgineering Fundamentals, second Ed.,Chapter 3, McGraw-Hill, 1986.Standard SKB an approach to identify enzyme activity:Cereal Chem., 16, 712, 1939.

Tabular Forms

PH OPTIMUM actions #2 #5 #6 (2 Students) ------------------------------------------------------------ Enzyme resources --------------------------------------------------- pH bacterial Fungal Amylo- Saliva Cellulase Amylase Amylase Glucosidase ------------------------------------------------------------ 5.0 --- --- 6.0 --- --- 7.0 8.0 --- --- 9.0 --- --- ------------------------------------------------------------ TEMPERATURE OPTIMUM action #3 (1 Student) ----------------------- Temperature bacter (C) Amylase ----------------------- 30 45 60 75 90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enzyme resources Time the ----------------------------------------------------------------Heat therapy Bacerial Fungal Amylo- at 90C Amylase Amylase Glucosidase (min) ---------------------------------------------------------------- no Ca++ /w Ca++ no Ca++ /w Ca++ no Ca++ /w Ca++------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 4 8 12 16 20------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REACTION KINETICS measures #7 #8 #10 (2 Students)---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Enzyme resources ------------------------------------------------------------------- bacterial Fungal Amylo- Amylase Amylase GlucosidaseReaction ------------------------------------------------------------------- Time no H2O2 /w H2O2 (min) ------------------------------------------------------------------- starch Glucose strength Glucose strength Glucose strength Glucose conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. Conc. (g/l) (g/l) (g/l) (g/l) (g/l) (g/l) (g/l) (g/l)---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 5 10 15 20 25 30---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENZYME CONCENTRATION action #11 (1 Student) --------------------------------------- Enzyme Enzyme resources ------------------------------ Volume Bacerial Fungal Amylo- (ml) Amylase Amylase Glucosidase --------------------------------------- 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 --------------------------------------- go back to Prof. Nam sunlight Wang"s house PageReturn come Biochemical barisalcity.orgineering activities (ENCH485)Starch Hydrolysis through AmylaseForward comments to:Nam sunlight WangDepartment of chemistry & Biomolecular barisalcity.orgineeringUniversity that MarylandCollege Park, MD 20742-2111301-405-1910 (voice)301-314-9126 (FAX)
*
e-mail: nsw