Question native Darcy:

When you acquisition a "bundle" of timber at the store, that is marked 0.75 cubic feet. What is the formula because that figuring the end that measurement because that cubic feet and also what portion of a true cord of timber (128 cubic feet) is it. I would certainly appreciate the formula so ns can develop a spreadsheet to aid my secretaries and myself be in compliance to the legislation when selling firewood. Thanks.

You are watching: How many bundles of firewood in a cord

Hi Darcy,

If every bundle was 1 cubic foot it would certainly take 128 of them to make a cord therefore each would certainly be one, one hundred and twenty-eighth that a cord.

If every bundle to be 2 cubic foot it would take 128/2= 64 of lock to do a cord therefore each would be one sixty 4th of a cord.

If each bundle was 0.5 cubic feet it would certainly take 128/0.5 = 256 of castle to do a cord therefore each would be one, two hundred and fifty-sixth of a cord.

If every bundle was 0.75 cubic feet it would certainly take 128/0.75 = 171 of lock to make a cord for this reason each would certainly be one, one hundred and also seventy-first that a cord.

I"m no sure exactly how the seller arrived at 0.75 cubic feet in a bundle. If the sticks space all roughly the same size you might tie castle in a bundle to kind a turbulent cylinder and then approximate the volume together the volume that a cylinder i beg your pardon is π r2 h where π = 3.14, r is the radius of the cylinder

in feet and also h is the length of the rod in feet.


Darcy wrote back

Thanks so much for the response. I have discovered on the web that a formula to number a cord (4 x 4 x 8) is length x height x width however my "answers" carry out not make sense. (For instance - the "answer" come 15" x 11" x 28" = 4,620.00. Do I "move" the decimal points to make it .462 cubic feet? The "bundles" in the save list the "bundle" as having 0.75 cubic feet. There room (6) pieces of hardwood in your bundles. Over there are almost everywhere from (24) to (28) pieces of timber in our "stack" and they measure out so much more than the store bundles. See my quandary?

Specifically other than 24 cubic feet (1/2 the a traditional pickup truck - fraction of a cord?) and 48 cubic feet (1 entire standard pickup truck portion of a cord?), we sell a "volume" of: size of log, 15" x 11" elevation of logs stacked with each other x 28" broad of logs stacked together. How countless cubic feet in the "bundle" - we call them "stacks" because instead that bundling them increase in plastic (which would most likely not be recycled), people pick them up in your cars as a "stack" of wood. The Dept. The Weights and Measures has actually instructed us to "do the math" and either label them in cubic feet or label them together a fraction of a cord.

Hi again Darcy,

The measurement length × broad × height does give you the volume however if you desire the systems to it is in cubic feet you require the dimensions in feet. There space 12 customs in a foot for this reason 15 inches is 15/12 feet, 11 inch is 11/12 feet and 28 inch is 28/12 feet. Thus the volume of her stack is

15/12 × 11/12 × 28/12 = 2.67 cubic feet

which is really close to 22/3 cubic feet.

Notice that 2.67/0.75 = 3.6 so my calculation gives your stacks as around 3.6 bundles. You stated that a bundle has 6 pieces and also a stack has actually 24 come 28 pieces and also 24/6 = 4 so every stack is 4 or much more bundles. At the very least we are in the same "ball park".

For her truck loads, a cord is 128 cubic feet, a conventional pickup is 48 cubic feet and 3 × 48 = 144 for this reason 3 truck loads is somewhat more than a cord. Therefore a truck load is a little much more than a third of a cord and fifty percent a truck load is a little much more than a 6th of a cord. Come be an ext precise a truckload is 48/128 = 0.375 and also hence a truckload is 0.375 of a cord.

See more: What Distinguishes A Permanent Magnet From A Temporary Magnet Ism Problem Set

I hope this helps,Harley

Math central is sustained by the university of Regina and The Pacific Institute because that the mathematical Sciences.