Hey Y'all, yes sir a friendly contest to guess how numerous pieces of candy corn space in a jar sitting in my RA's office. Ns was wondering if you males had any type of novel techniques for estimating how plenty of pieces there are. I was simply going to division the jar's volume through the volume the a piece of candy corn and then rounding under a pair pieces.

You are watching: Guess how many candy corn in the jar


*

You likewise have to account for the air in in between the pieces of candy corn. Random close pack tells united state that the maximum worth of volume percentage for randomly monodisperse spheres is 63.8%. The shape of a candy corn is different than a sphere, or even an M&M, for this reason a safe assumption might be 70% (the level sides of candy corn allow for an ext tight packing). Girlfriend can adjust this number based upon your assessment of the pack of the liquid corn of your particular jar.

So take her assumption: The volume the the jar separated by the volume of candy corn, and multiply the by 0.7, or every little thing percentage you decision most explains the packing of the candy corn in the jar.


2
Reply
Share
ReportSave
level 2
· 7y
BEEP BOOP

Random near pack:

Random near packing (RCP) is one empirical parameter supplied to characterize the best volume fraction of hard objects acquired when they room packed randomly. For example, once a solid container is filled v grain, shiver the container will mitigate the volume taken increase by the objects, hence allowing much more grain to be included to the container. In other words shaking rises the density of pack objects.

See more: How Many Lines In Space Are Its Perpendicular Bisectors Of A Given Segment?

Experiments have presented that the most compact means to pack spheres randomly provides a maximum density of about 64%. Many recent research predicts analytically that the volume fraction filled through the heavy objects in random close packing cannot exceed a thickness limit of 63.4% because that (monodisperse) spherical objects. This is substantially smaller than the preferably theoretical filling portion of 0.74048 that outcomes from hexagonal close pack (HCP – likewise known as close-packing). This discrepancy demonstrates that the "randomness" the RCP is an important to the definition.

Interesting: sphere ^packing | Close-packing of equal ^spheres | Bagnold ^number | index of physics write-ups ^(R)

Parent commenter deserve to toggle ^NSFW or ^delete. Will also delete on comment score that -1 or less. | faqs | ^Mods | Magic ^Words